Fields of Victory — Inside the Classic

(0 User reviews) 752

In Category - World Events

Authors: Ward, Humphry, Mrs., 1851-1920 Digital Source: Project Gutenberg Gutenberg Release Year: 2004 First Publication Year: Not confirmed

Key Word: World War, 1914-1918 -- Personal narratives; World War, 1914-1918 -- Campaigns -- France Target Reader: Readers of public-domain and historical texts

Book Edition: Project Gutenberg digital edition Book Language: en

Edition facts

Words 60,404

Reading time 263 min

Text sections 6

Fields of Victory — Inside the Classic can be approached with a clearer sense of reading commitment from its source measurements: 60,404 words, 4 hr 23 min estimated reading time, and 6 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 26.3 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “World War, 1914-1918 -- Personal narratives,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

Source: Project Gutenberg record #13827

Mrs. Humphry Ward's 1919 account of post-Armistice France, based on two journeys to the Western Front. Drawing on interviews with British commanders and official despatches, she examines the British Empire's role in the final campaigns, the impact of American entry, and the war's material and human landscape.

Read the complete public-domain text at its original source.

Read on Project Gutenberg

Mrs. Humphry Ward opens Fields of Victory with a frank acknowledgment of the difficulty of writing about the war in the immediate aftermath of the Armistice. She notes that impressions were changing rapidly and that older forms of war writing seemed already dated. Her stated purpose is to clarify, for herself and her readers, the part played by the British Empire in the concluding campaigns. To do so, she relies on the three great despatches of the British Commander-in-Chief and on conversations with officers at British Headquarters in France and the War Office. The book is thus positioned as a report from the ground, filtered through official and high-level military perspectives.

A Reporter's Method and Limits

Ward is explicit about her sources and her limitations. She describes her work as a faithful report of the opinions of the British Higher Command and individual officers who had taken an active part in the war. She does not claim to have witnessed every event she describes; instead, she synthesizes official despatches and personal interviews. This method gives the book a documentary quality, but it also means that the narrative is shaped by the perspectives of those at the heart of the British military establishment. Ward acknowledges that her account is broad and summary, and that its value lies in its proximity to decision-makers rather than in comprehensive coverage of the war.

The American Entry and the Russian Revolution

In a chapter on America in France, Ward recounts a conversation with an officer from the Intelligence Department at General Headquarters in early 1917. The officer predicted that America would enter the war, remarking that Germany had gone too far to draw back. Ward notes the sharp criticism of President Wilson's patience among Americans themselves, but she also highlights the rapidity of American action after the declaration of war: conscription adopted in forty days, General Pershing sailing within eighty days, and the adoption of the blockade policy within ninety days. She contrasts this with the Russian Revolution of March 1917, which initially brought sympathy but soon gave way to misgivings among those who saw the fall of a house built on rotten foundations. The entry of America, she suggests, may have dulled Allied perceptions of the Russian crisis.

Tanks, Aeroplanes, and the Staff Work of the War

Ward devotes a chapter to what she calls the features of the war, including tanks and aeroplanes, and the staff work that coordinated them. She describes the tank as a weapon that broke the stalemate of trench warfare, and she emphasizes the importance of the British staff in planning and executing the campaigns of 1918. Her account is based on interviews with officers who had direct experience of these operations. She does not provide technical specifications or detailed battle narratives, but instead focuses on the organizational and strategic innovations that she believes were decisive. The chapter reflects her interest in the machinery of war and the human intelligence behind it.

Readers should approach Fields of Victory as a contemporary document shaped by its moment—written just months after the Armistice, before the full historical record was available. Ward's reliance on British official sources gives the book a particular angle, and her observations on the American entry and the Russian Revolution are filtered through that lens. The book is most valuable for its snapshot of how the war was understood by those close to the British command in the immediate postwar period.

Reading Mrs. Humphry Ward’s descriptions of the torn French fields, I remembered standing once in a quiet, sunlit room, tracing a map of Pacific atolls in Breaking the Outer Ring: Marine Landings in the Marshall Islands — Reading Notes, and feeling the same odd stillness—how a landscape holds what happened there, long after the noise has gone.